Zombie ants

Craziness.

Comments

  1. AnonymousMay 17, 2011 at 6:55 PM

    Hear the rest of the story at http://blogpestcontrol.com/zombie-ants/

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

From "Mandate" to "A Country Divided"

A post apropos of Inauguration Day. Last month, Hendrik Hertzberg pointed out that after the 2004 election, the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal congratulated George W. Bush for "what by any measure is a decisive mandate for a second term."  This past election, the Journal's board described Obama as "eking out a second term."  In 2004, the Journal was quick to say, "Just because an election is close doesn't mean it isn't decisive."  In 2012, the Journal intoned gravely about a country "divided" and "polarized."  Apparently, when your side wins narrowly, the results are a "decisive" vindication of how right you are, but when the other side wins narrowly (but still by more than you did the last time around), it still doesn't mean you're wrong.  I especially liked how the Journal commented on how Obama was able to win re-election "even as he lost independents and won only 40% of the overall...
Read more

Time for Eros?

Ah, my first blog post! I recently finished Anne Carson's Eros the Bittersweet .  She writes about Lysias' speech of the non-lover in Plato's Phaedrus , and how that speech derives its power by looking at the love affair not from the moment of inception, but from the moment of or after its dissolution.  As she says, "Lysias looks at a love affair from the point of view of the end," but "[n]o one in love really believes love will end." Today, I was reading the comic strip Luann , which had Luann telling an Australian foreign exchange student she likes, "There's no point in starting something if you're just going to go back to Australia."  Ah, the sober prudence of the American teenage girl, who will not sacrifice her precious adolescent years in pursuit of something that can only be fleeting and temporary, however otherwise pleasant and enjoyable it may otherwise be, when there is not even the possibility of a happily ever after to t...
Read more

Speaking of Heidegger...

Hubert Dreyfus co-authored a column in the New York Times in which he says (and I agree), "The greatest danger of Watson’s victory is not that it proves machines could be better versions of us, but that it tempts us to misunderstand ourselves as poorer versions of them."  However, he also quotes John Haugeland as saying, "The problem with computers is that they just don’t give a damn."  The implication is that human caring is what distinguishes us from computers.  I think that is not quite right. Now, in the source material, i.e., Heidegger, Da-sein cares because Da-sein is being-towards-death.  Da-sein cares because Da-sein dies.  However, what Kubrick and others present is the possibility of an artificial intelligence that cares but does not die (A.I. is like animals in this sense; animals also do not die, in the Heideggerian sense).  This is possible without self-consciousness.  It is conceivable to me (and perhaps this is because I know nothin...
Read more