The Thing about Surveys

Everyone knows that there are lies, damned lies, and then there are statistics.  Nowhere is this more obvious than when interpreting survey results.

In a March essay on America's political polarization in The New Republic, Bill Galston noted:
above and beyond their ideological disagreements, conservatives and liberals have come to understand the practice of politics differently. In a survey taken right after the Republican sweep in the 2010 midterm elections, 47 percent of American said that it was more important to compromise in order to get things done, versus 27 percent who thought it was more important for leaders to stick to their beliefs even if little got done. Liberal Democrats weighed in on the side of compromise, 58 to 16, moderate Democrats by 64 to 17. But conservative Republicans (the overwhelming majority of their party) favored sticking to their beliefs by 45 to 26. Ten months later, after the debt ceiling fiasco, an outright majority of adults favored compromise, including 62 percent of Democrats and 63 percent of liberals. But pluralities of Republicans and conservatives continued to favor leaders who stuck to their beliefs.
Republicans disdain compromise more than Democrats.  This is not surprising to anyone who has any familiarity with American politics.  There is, for example, no corresponding term for RINO on the left.  Republicans are much more concerned with ideological purity than Democrats.  Republicans tend to prize clarity and certainty more than Democrats.

But while a full 20% more Americans thought it was more important to compromise to get things done (a testament to Americans' once vaunted pragmatism), if you actually go to the USA Today/Gallup Poll survey, you find that 49% of these same respondents wanted Congress to have more influence over the direction of the country, while 41% wanted President Obama to have more influence over the direction of the country.  Now, the sampling error is +/-4%, which means this is almost a statistical dead heat, but that's not the point.  The point is that while Americans want our politicians to compromise, we also want to give more influence to the party that we ourselves perceive to be less inclined to compromise!  Galston's omission of this detail in his description of the survey results is misleading.  I know that politicans pick and choose the facts they use to score political points, but the aims of scholars should be different, even when they put on the pundit's hat.

Now the survey results do not necesarily mean that Americans don't know what they want, or want mutually incompatible things.  They could be the result of careful consideration of competing political values such as the value of the spirit of compromise as a political virtue against the prerogatives of institutional authority and separation of powers concerns.  I leave it to you to decide which is more likely.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Time for Eros?

Ah, my first blog post! I recently finished Anne Carson's Eros the Bittersweet .  She writes about Lysias' speech of the non-lover in Plato's Phaedrus , and how that speech derives its power by looking at the love affair not from the moment of inception, but from the moment of or after its dissolution.  As she says, "Lysias looks at a love affair from the point of view of the end," but "[n]o one in love really believes love will end." Today, I was reading the comic strip Luann , which had Luann telling an Australian foreign exchange student she likes, "There's no point in starting something if you're just going to go back to Australia."  Ah, the sober prudence of the American teenage girl, who will not sacrifice her precious adolescent years in pursuit of something that can only be fleeting and temporary, however otherwise pleasant and enjoyable it may otherwise be, when there is not even the possibility of a happily ever after to t...
Read more

Drake, Aristotle, Two French Films, and The Question of Nihilism

"Looking for the right way to do the wrong things"  --Drake, "Lord Knows" "[V]irtue aims at the median.  I am referring to moral virtue ... We can experience fear, confidence, desire, anger, pity, and generally any kind of pleasure and pain either too much or too little, and in either case not properly.  But to experience all this at the right time, toward the right objects, toward the right people, for the right reason, and in the right manner--that is the median and the best course, the course that is a mark of virtue. ****** Not every action nor every emotion admits of a mean.  There are some actions and emotions whose very names connote baseness, e.g., spite, shamelessness, envy; and among actions, adultery, theft, and murder.... In cases of this sort, let us say adultery, rightness and wrongness do not depend on committing it with the right woman at the right time and in the right manner, but the mere fact of committing such action at all is to do wr...
Read more

Review of Corey Robin's The Reactionary Mind (2nd edition)

The political Left today is resurgent, led by a newly galvanized Black Lives Matter movement in the wake of George Floyd’s death on Memorial Day.   Massive protests erupted across the country (perhaps because COVID-19 had canceled most people’s summer vacation plans), including Seattle, where protestors faced down police and claimed the Capitol Hill section.   Leaders at some of the country’s most prestigious universities have fallen over themselves to issue statements condemning racism and affirming that black lives matter (sometimes with capitalization).   Princeton University announced that it would rename the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs as well as Wilson College (Wilson served as president of Princeton University from 1902-10), and the American Political Science Association is considering renaming the award that bears his name (Wilson served as president of APSA from 1909-10), due to Wilson’s “ racist thinking and policies .”   NAS...
Read more